1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 C&C 35 Mk II2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsBeneteau
Year1974–19792013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaFrance
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is 0.57m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 C&C 35 Mk II · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3