1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 C&C 35 Mk II2013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsElan
Year1974–19792013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaSlovenia
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 C&C 35 Mk II · 2013 Elan 350