Hanse 375 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

Hanse 375
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3752013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerHanseElan
Year2009–20152013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySlovenia
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA11.35 m (37.2 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL10.05 m (33.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 375
17.21
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 375
30.71
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 375
0.76
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 375
17.59
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 375 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 375 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The Hanse 375 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the Hanse 375 measures 11.35m (37.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The Hanse 375 is 0.68m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The Hanse 375 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 375 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.7% for the Hanse 375 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 375 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 375 · 2013 Elan 350