2012 Hanse 385 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

2012 Hanse 385
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2012 Hanse 3852013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerHanseElan
Year2012–20162013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySlovenia
DesignerJudel/VrolijkRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL10.15 m (33.3 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.88 m (12.7 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,300 kg (16,094 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area67.0 m² (721 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2012 Hanse 385
18.09
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2012 Hanse 385
30.14
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2012 Hanse 385
0.80
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2012 Hanse 385
16.64
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2012 Hanse 385 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2012 Hanse 385 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2012 Hanse 385 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2012 Hanse 385 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.88m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2012 Hanse 385 is 0.73m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 2012 Hanse 385 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2012 Hanse 385 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 67.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Hanse 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2012 Hanse 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.1% for the 2012 Hanse 385 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2012 Hanse 385 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Hanse 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Hanse 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2012 Hanse 385 · 2013 Elan 350