1974 Tartan 27 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1974 Tartan 27 1974 Tartan 27
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1974 Tartan 27 1982 Westerly Konsort
General
Manufacturer Tartan Westerly
Year 1974–1980 1982–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Sparkman & Stephens Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL 6.40 m (21.0 ft) 7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam 2.69 m (8.8 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 33.5 m² (361 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 Tartan 27
16.56
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 Tartan 27
46.17
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 Tartan 27
0.75
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 Tartan 27
25.11
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 Tartan 27 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 Tartan 27 is a 1970s design by Tartan from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1974 Tartan 27 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1974 Tartan 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 1.27m longer than the 1974 Tartan 27. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 54% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 Tartan 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.56 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1974 Tartan 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 Tartan 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1974 Tartan 27 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 Tartan 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 Tartan 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 Tartan 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS