1975 Pearson 39 vs Hanse 370 — Comparison
1975 Pearson 39
Hanse 370
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1975 Pearson 39 | Hanse 370 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Hanse |
| Year | 1975–1980 | 2004–2008 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | William Shaw | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.89 m (39.0 ft) | 11.40 m (37.4 ft) |
| LWL | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 10.10 m (33.1 ft) |
| Beam | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) | 3.63 m (11.9 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.90 m (6.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) | 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 60.8 m² (654 ft²) | 60.0 m² (646 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 29 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 130 L (34.3 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1975 Pearson 39 and Hanse 370 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the Hanse 370 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The Hanse 370 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Hanse 370 at 11.40m (37.4ft) with a 3.63m beam. The 1975 Pearson 39 is 0.49m longer than the Hanse 370. The 1975 Pearson 39 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The Hanse 370, with an SA/D of 16.98 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 370 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Hanse 370 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 30.9% for the Hanse 370, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hanse 370 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 370 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1975 Pearson 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.