1976 C&C 33 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1976 C&C 33
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1976 C&C 331983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsIrwin
Year1976–19821983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1976 C&C 33
15.57
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1976 C&C 33
45.00
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1976 C&C 33
0.81
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1976 C&C 33
18.07
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1976 C&C 33 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1976 C&C 33 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1976 C&C 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1976 C&C 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1976 C&C 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1976 C&C 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1976 C&C 33 · 1983 Irwin 32