1977 Westerly Centaur vs Hunter 185 — Comparison

1977 Westerly Centaur 1977 Westerly Centaur
VS
Hunter 185 Hunter 185

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1977 Westerly Centaur Hunter 185
General
Manufacturer Westerly Hunter
Year 1977–1981 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK USA
Designer Laurent Giles Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 7.92 m (26.0 ft) 5.54 m (18.2 ft)
LWL 6.40 m (21.0 ft) 4.95 m (16.2 ft)
Beam 2.69 m (8.8 ft) 2.13 m (7.0 ft)
Draft 1.07 m (3.5 ft) 0.91 m (3.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 408 kg (899 lbs)
Ballast 1,089 kg (2,401 lbs) 82 kg (181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 26.9 m² (290 ft²) 13.0 m² (140 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Centerboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 2
Cabins 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1977 Westerly Centaur
14.02
Hunter 185
24.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1977 Westerly Centaur
40.01
Hunter 185
20.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1977 Westerly Centaur
0.77
Hunter 185
1.15
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1977 Westerly Centaur
23.82
Hunter 185
8.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1977 Westerly Centaur and Hunter 185 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1977 Westerly Centaur is a 1970s design by Westerly from UK, while the Hunter 185 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1977 Westerly Centaur was penned by Laurent Giles. The Hunter 185 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1977 Westerly Centaur measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the Hunter 185 at 5.54m (18.2ft) with a 2.13m beam. The 1977 Westerly Centaur is 2.38m longer than the Hunter 185. The 1977 Westerly Centaur displaces approximately 567% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1977 Westerly Centaur has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.02 and 26.9 m² of sail area. The Hunter 185, with an SA/D of 24.03 and 13.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The Hunter 185 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1977 Westerly Centaur offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 185 has a comfort ratio of 8.7 and a capsize screening value of 1.15. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1977 Westerly Centaur and 20.1% for the Hunter 185, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1977 Westerly Centaur provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The Hunter 185 offers 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Westerly Centaur is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 185 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1977 Westerly Centaur offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS