1978 Bristol 40 vs 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 — Comparison

1978 Bristol 401978 Bristol 40
VS
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Bristol 402002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
General
ManufacturerBristolJeanneau
Year1978–19832002–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerTed HoodDaniel Andrieu
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)13.10 m (43.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.40 m (37.4 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)4.08 m (13.4 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Bristol 40
15.63
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
18.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Bristol 40
41.67
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
32.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Bristol 40
0.67
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Bristol 40
24.80
2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43
15.31

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Bristol 40 and 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Bristol 40 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 is a 2000s offering from Jeanneau from France. The 1978 Bristol 40 was penned by Ted Hood. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 was designed by Daniel Andrieu.

In terms of size, the 1978 Bristol 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 at 13.10m (43.0ft) with a 4.08m beam. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 is 0.91m longer than the 1978 Bristol 40. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Bristol 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43, with an SA/D of 18.05 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Bristol 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 has a comfort ratio of 15.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Bristol 40 and 32.6% for the 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Bristol 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Bristol 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Bristol 40 · 2002 Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 43