1978 Bristol 40 vs 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II — Comparison

1978 Bristol 401978 Bristol 40
VS
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Bristol 402003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
General
ManufacturerBristolHallberg-Rassy
Year1978–19832003–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerTed HoodGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)13.15 m (43.1 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)4.05 m (13.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.05 m (6.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)11,500 kg (25,353 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)84.0 m² (904 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)500 L (132.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Bristol 40
15.63
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
16.75
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Bristol 40
41.67
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Bristol 40
0.67
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Bristol 40
24.80
2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II
20.22

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Bristol 40 and 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Bristol 40 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II is a 2000s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1978 Bristol 40 was penned by Ted Hood. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1978 Bristol 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II at 13.15m (43.1ft) with a 4.05m beam. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II is 0.96m longer than the 1978 Bristol 40. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Bristol 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II, with an SA/D of 16.75 and 84.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Bristol 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1978 Bristol 40 and 39.1% for the 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Bristol 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 500L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Bristol 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Bristol 40 · 2003 Hallberg-Rassy 43 Mk II