1979 Westerly Fulmar vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Westerly Fulmar1995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerWesterlyFeeling
Year1979–19861995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerEd DuboisPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL8.00 m (26.2 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity136 L (35.9 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 2.05m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Westerly Fulmar · 1995 Feeling 39