1981 Pearson 36 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 361981 Pearson 36
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 361995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerPearsonFeeling
Year1981–19851995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam ShawPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.6 m² (555 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.13m longer than the 1981 Pearson 36. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · 1995 Feeling 39