1980 Contest 33 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

1980 Contest 331980 Contest 33
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Contest 331988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
ManufacturerContestPacific Seacraft
Year1980–19901988–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Contest 33
14.90
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Contest 33
40.38
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Contest 33
0.74
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Contest 33
22.02
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Contest 33 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1980 Contest 33 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1980 Contest 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1980 Contest 33 is 0.61m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1980 Contest 33 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Contest 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1980 Contest 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Contest 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Contest 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Contest 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1980 Contest 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Contest 33 · 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31