1980 CS 33 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1980 CS 33
VS
1972 Ranger 291972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 CS 331972 Ranger 29
General
ManufacturerCS YachtsRanger
Year1980–19871972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerRay WallGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.1 m² (529 ft²)35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1980 CS 33 is 1.22m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1980 CS 33 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 CS 33 · 1972 Ranger 29