1990 Sabre 36 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison
1990 Sabre 36
1972 Ranger 29
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1990 Sabre 36 | 1972 Ranger 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Ranger |
| Year | 1990–1998 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Roger Hewson | Gary Mull |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.60 m (5.2 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.5 m² (565 ft²) | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1990 Sabre 36 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1990 Sabre 36 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.
In terms of size, the 1990 Sabre 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 2.13m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 86% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1990 Sabre 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1972 Ranger 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1990 Sabre 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1990 Sabre 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1972 Ranger 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1990 Sabre 36 · 1972 Ranger 29