1980 CS 33 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1980 CS 33 1980 CS 33
VS
Hunter 33 Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1980 CS 33 Hunter 33
General
Manufacturer CS Yachts Hunter
Year 1980–1987 1988–1994
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada USA
Designer Ray Wall Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 49.1 m² (529 ft²) 48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS