1980 CS 33 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1980 CS 33
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 CS 332010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerCS YachtsElan
Year1980–19872010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaSlovenia
DesignerRay WallRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.1 m² (529 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 0.30m longer than the 1980 CS 33. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 CS 33 · 2010 Elan 340