1980 CS 33 vs Catalina 425 — Comparison

1980 CS 33
VS
Catalina 425Catalina 425

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 CS 33Catalina 425
General
ManufacturerCS YachtsCatalina
Year1980–19872013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerRay WallGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.95 m (42.5 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.06 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)9,616 kg (21,200 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)3,719 kg (8,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.1 m² (529 ft²)78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)322 L (85.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
Catalina 425
17.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
Catalina 425
38.68
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
Catalina 425
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
Catalina 425
17.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and Catalina 425 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the Catalina 425 is a modern offering from Catalina from USA. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The Catalina 425 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Catalina 425 at 12.95m (42.5ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Catalina 425 is 2.89m longer than the 1980 CS 33. The Catalina 425 displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The Catalina 425, with an SA/D of 17.52 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Catalina 425 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 38.7% for the Catalina 425, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Catalina 425 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 322L water and 152L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 425 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 CS 33 · Catalina 425