1980 CS 33 vs Hanse 315 — Comparison

1980 CS 33 1980 CS 33
VS
Hanse 315 Hanse 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1980 CS 33 Hanse 315
General
Manufacturer CS Yachts Hanse
Year 1980–1987 2010–2016
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada Germany
Designer Ray Wall judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 9.65 m (31.7 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.55 m (28.1 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 49.1 m² (529 ft²) 41.5 m² (447 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 85 L (22.5 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
Hanse 315
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
Hanse 315
28.57
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
Hanse 315
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
Hanse 315
17.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and Hanse 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the Hanse 315 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The Hanse 315 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Hanse 315 at 9.65m (31.7ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1980 CS 33 is 0.41m longer than the Hanse 315. The 1980 CS 33 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The Hanse 315, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 315 has a comfort ratio of 17.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 28.6% for the Hanse 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 315 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L water and 85L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1980 CS 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS