1980 Peterson 34 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

1980 Peterson 34
VS
Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Peterson 34Hanse 400
General
ManufacturerPetersonHanse
Year1980–19862002–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerDoug Petersonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Peterson 34
17.26
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Peterson 34
43.48
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Peterson 34
0.76
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Peterson 34
19.98
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Peterson 34 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Peterson 34 is a 1980s design by Peterson from USA, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1980 Peterson 34 was penned by Doug Peterson. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1980 Peterson 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The Hanse 400 is 1.74m longer than the 1980 Peterson 34. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 46% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Peterson 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Peterson 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1980 Peterson 34 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Peterson 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Peterson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Peterson 34 · Hanse 400