1982 Hunter 34 vs Hanse 415 — Comparison

1982 Hunter 341982 Hunter 34
VS
Hanse 415

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Hunter 34Hanse 415
General
ManufacturerHunterHanse
Year1982–19882011–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerHunter Design Teamjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.40 m (40.7 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.90 m (35.8 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,650 kg (5,842 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)310 L (81.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Hunter 34
16.48
Hanse 415
17.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Hunter 34
40.00
Hanse 415
31.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Hunter 34
0.80
Hanse 415
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Hunter 34
19.05
Hanse 415
16.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Hunter 34 and Hanse 415 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Hunter 34 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hanse 415 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1982 Hunter 34 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The Hanse 415 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1982 Hunter 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Hanse 415 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Hanse 415 is 2.04m longer than the 1982 Hunter 34. The Hanse 415 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Hunter 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.48 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 415, with an SA/D of 17.81 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 415 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Hunter 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hanse 415 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 Hunter 34 and 31.2% for the Hanse 415, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Hunter 34 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Hanse 415 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 310L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Hunter 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 415 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 415 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Hunter 34 · Hanse 415