1982 Island Packet 31 vs 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 — Comparison
1982 Island Packet 31
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 Island Packet 31 | 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Island Packet | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 1982–1994 | 1999–2007 |
| Type | Cutter | Cutter |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Bob Johnson | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.08 m (26.5 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 49.2 m² (530 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 25 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 340 L (89.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 Island Packet 31 and 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1982 Island Packet 31 is a 1980s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is a 1990s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1982 Island Packet 31 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 1982 Island Packet 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is 2.74m longer than the 1982 Island Packet 31. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 Island Packet 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.32 and 49.2 m² of sail area. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40, with an SA/D of 15.83 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 Island Packet 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1982 Island Packet 31 and 40.5% for the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 Island Packet 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L water and 189L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Island Packet 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.