1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
1988 Moody 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 | 1988 Moody 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Moody |
| Year | 1982–2005 | 1988–1993 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | UK |
| Designer | William Crealock | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) | 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) | 54.0 m² (581 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 7 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was penned by William Crealock. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.64m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1988 Moody 36 is 2.74m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 114% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Moody 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1988 Moody 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.