1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 vs 1993 Feeling 36 — Comparison

1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
VS
1993 Feeling 36 1993 Feeling 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 1993 Feeling 36
General
Manufacturer Pacific Seacraft Feeling
Year 1982–2005 1993–2001
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer William Crealock Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 6.55 m (21.5 ft) 9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam 2.64 m (8.7 ft) 3.52 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 1.14 m (3.7 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 6,200 kg (13,669 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 2,300 kg (5,071 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 30.5 m² (328 ft²) 53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
1993 Feeling 36
15.96
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
1993 Feeling 36
37.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
1993 Feeling 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91
1993 Feeling 36
18.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 1993 Feeling 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1993 Feeling 36 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was penned by William Crealock. The 1993 Feeling 36 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.64m, compared to the 1993 Feeling 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.52m beam. The 1993 Feeling 36 is 2.74m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1993 Feeling 36 displaces approximately 95% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of sail area. The 1993 Feeling 36, with an SA/D of 15.96 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1993 Feeling 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1993 Feeling 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 37.1% for the 1993 Feeling 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1993 Feeling 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1993 Feeling 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1993 Feeling 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS