1982 S2 11.0A vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison
1982 S2 11.0A
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 S2 11.0A | 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | S2 | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 1982–1987 | 1988–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Arthur Edmunds | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,670 kg (12,500 lbs) | 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) | 40.5 m² (436 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 25 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 S2 11.0A and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 11.0A is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1982 S2 11.0A was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 1982 S2 11.0A measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1982 S2 11.0A is 1.52m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1982 S2 11.0A displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 11.0A has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.57 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 S2 11.0A has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 11.0A offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 11.0A and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 S2 11.0A provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1982 S2 11.0A has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1982 S2 11.0A offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.