1982 S2 7.9 vs 1978 C&C 24 — Comparison
1978 C&C 24
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 S2 7.9 | 1978 C&C 24 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | S2 | C&C Yachts |
| Year | 1982–1988 | 1978–1983 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Canada |
| Designer | Arthur Edmunds | Cuthbertson & Cassian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.90 m (25.9 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.71 m (22.0 ft) | 6.10 m (20.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 1,497 kg (3,300 lbs) |
| Ballast | 907 kg (2,000 lbs) | 612 kg (1,349 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 31.6 m² (340 ft²) | 24.0 m² (258 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 7 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 19 L (5.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 30 L (7.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 4 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 S2 7.9 and 1978 C&C 24 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1978 C&C 24 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.
In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1978 C&C 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1982 S2 7.9 is 0.58m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1982 S2 7.9 displaces approximately 52% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The 1978 C&C 24, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The 1978 C&C 24 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.85. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1978 C&C 24 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 S2 7.9 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1982 S2 7.9 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · 1978 C&C 24