1982 Westerly Konsort vs 1984 O'Day 30 — Comparison

1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort
VS
1984 O'Day 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Westerly Konsort1984 O'Day 30
General
ManufacturerWesterlyO'Day
Year1982–19901984–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerEd DuboisC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.50 m (31.2 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)1,452 kg (3,201 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
1984 O'Day 30
15.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
1984 O'Day 30
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
1984 O'Day 30
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75
1984 O'Day 30
19.36

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Westerly Konsort and 1984 O'Day 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1984 O'Day 30 is a 1980s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1984 O'Day 30 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1982 Westerly Konsort measures 9.50m (31.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1984 O'Day 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 0.36m longer than the 1984 O'Day 30. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Westerly Konsort has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 O'Day 30, with an SA/D of 15.49 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 O'Day 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Westerly Konsort offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 O'Day 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort and 40.0% for the 1984 O'Day 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Westerly Konsort provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1984 O'Day 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 O'Day 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Westerly Konsort · 1984 O'Day 30