1984 Sabre 34 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1984 Sabre 34
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 Sabre 342013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerSabreBeneteau
Year1984–19902013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerRoger HewsonVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Sabre 34
16.96
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Sabre 34
41.74
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Sabre 34
0.74
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Sabre 34
21.14
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Sabre 34 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Sabre 34 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1984 Sabre 34 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1984 Sabre 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1984 Sabre 34 is 0.26m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1984 Sabre 34 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Sabre 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.96 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Sabre 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1984 Sabre 34 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Sabre 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Sabre 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Sabre 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 Sabre 34 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3