1985 Sabre 32 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1985 Sabre 321985 Sabre 32
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Sabre 322014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerSabreElan
Year1985–19912014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRoger HewsonRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.45 m (4.8 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Sabre 32
16.71
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Sabre 32
40.00
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Sabre 32
0.78
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Sabre 32
18.88
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Sabre 32 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Sabre 32 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1985 Sabre 32 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1985 Sabre 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 2.32m longer than the 1985 Sabre 32. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 101% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Sabre 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.71 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Sabre 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1985 Sabre 32 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Sabre 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Sabre 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Sabre 32 · 2014 Elan 400