1985 Westerly Storm 33 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1985 Westerly Storm 33
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Westerly Storm 33Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerWesterlyHanse
Year1985–19902005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKGermany
DesignerEd Duboisjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.0 m² (484 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
15.20
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
41.74
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
0.77
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Westerly Storm 33
20.29
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 was penned by Ed Dubois. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.20 and 45.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Westerly Storm 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Westerly Storm 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Westerly Storm 33 · Hanse 320