1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison
2010 Elan 340
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 | 2010 Elan 340 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Elan |
| Year | 1986–2007 | 2010–2014 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Slovenia |
| Designer | William Crealock | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| LWL | 5.94 m (19.5 ft) | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.07 m (3.5 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) |
| Ballast | 953 kg (2,101 lbs) | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 24.0 m² (258 ft²) | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 160 L (42.3 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 2.74m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 156% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2010 Elan 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 · 2010 Elan 340