1988 C&C 32 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 321977 Cal 33
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsCal
Year1988–19931977–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1977 Cal 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The 1977 Cal 33 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · 1977 Cal 33