1988 C&C 32 vs 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32 1988 C&C 32
VS
1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 C&C 32 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40
General
Manufacturer C&C Yachts Hinckley
Year 1988–1993 1980–1990
Type Sloop Yawl
Country Canada USA
Designer Cuthbertson & Cassian McCurdy & Rhodes
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,996 kg (4,400 lbs) 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 45.8 m² (493 ft²) 62.4 m² (672 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 265 L (70.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40
15.63
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40
0.67
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40
26.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 is a 1980s offering from Hinckley from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 was designed by McCurdy & Rhodes.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 is 2.44m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40, with an SA/D of 15.63 and 62.4 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 has a comfort ratio of 26.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.67. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 41.7% for the 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 265L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 Hinckley Bermuda 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS