1988 C&C 32 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison
Hunter 260
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1988 C&C 32 | Hunter 260 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | C&C Yachts | Hunter |
| Year | 1988–1993 | 1998–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Canada | USA |
| Designer | Cuthbertson & Cassian | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 7.85 m (25.8 ft) |
| LWL | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 6.86 m (22.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,996 kg (4,400 lbs) | 771 kg (1,700 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 45.8 m² (493 ft²) | 27.5 m² (296 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L (18.0 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1988 C&C 32 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1988 C&C 32 is 1.90m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1988 C&C 32 displaces approximately 122% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1988 C&C 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Hunter 260