1988 Contest 38 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1988 Contest 381988 Contest 38
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Contest 381973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerContestRanger
Year1988–19961973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area61.5 m² (662 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Contest 38
16.01
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Contest 38
41.17
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Contest 38
0.70
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Contest 38
23.22
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Contest 38 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Contest 38 is a 1980s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1988 Contest 38 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1988 Contest 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 Contest 38 is 1.49m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 1988 Contest 38 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Contest 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 61.5 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Contest 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Contest 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1988 Contest 38 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Contest 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Contest 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Contest 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Contest 38 · 1973 Ranger 33