1988 Moody 36 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1988 Moody 361988 Moody 36
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Moody 361973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerMoodyRanger
Year1988–19931973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerBill DixonGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.0 m² (581 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Moody 36
15.29
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Moody 36
39.71
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Moody 36
0.74
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Moody 36
20.90
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Moody 36 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1988 Moody 36 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1988 Moody 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 Moody 36 is 0.91m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Moody 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Ranger 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Moody 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Moody 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Ranger 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Moody 36 · 1973 Ranger 33