1988 Najad 331 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1988 Najad 331
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Najad 3311973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerNajadRanger
Year1988–19981973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Najad 331
15.15
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Najad 331
40.82
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Najad 331
0.75
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Najad 331
20.43
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Najad 331 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Najad 331 is a 1980s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1988 Najad 331 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1988 Najad 331 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 Najad 331 displaces approximately 3% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Najad 331 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.15 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Ranger 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Najad 331 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1988 Najad 331 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Najad 331 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Ranger 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Najad 331 · 1973 Ranger 33