1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
VS
1990 Feeling 32 1990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 1990 Feeling 32
General
Manufacturer Pacific Seacraft Feeling
Year 1988–2007 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer William Crealock Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.5 m² (436 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 25 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 0.40m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Feeling 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Feeling 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS