1990 Contest 40S vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

1990 Contest 40S1990 Contest 40S
VS
Hunter 380Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Contest 40SHunter 380
General
ManufacturerContestHunter
Year1990–20002001–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUSA
DesignerDick ZaalGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.25 m (40.2 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.5 m² (737 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Contest 40S
16.00
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Contest 40S
40.00
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Contest 40S
0.71
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Contest 40S
21.09
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Contest 40S and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Contest 40S is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1990 Contest 40S was penned by Dick Zaal. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1990 Contest 40S measures 12.25m (40.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The 1990 Contest 40S is 0.67m longer than the Hunter 380. The 1990 Contest 40S displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Contest 40S has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.00 and 68.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Contest 40S offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Contest 40S and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Contest 40S provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Contest 40S is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Contest 40S · Hunter 380