1990 Feeling 32 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1990 Feeling 32 1990 Feeling 32
VS
1973 Ranger 33 1973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 Feeling 32 1973 Ranger 33
General
Manufacturer Feeling Ranger
Year 1990–1998 1973–1979
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Philippe Harlé Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 9.85 m (32.3 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.20 m (26.9 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.15 m (10.3 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.50 m (4.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.0 m² (431 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Feeling 32
20.72
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Feeling 32 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1990 Feeling 32 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1990 Feeling 32 measures 9.85m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 0.21m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Feeling 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Ranger 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Feeling 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Feeling 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Ranger 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS