1990 Feeling 32 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Feeling 321995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerFeelingFeeling
Year1990–19981995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFrance
DesignerPhilippe HarléPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA9.85 m (32.3 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL8.20 m (26.9 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Feeling 32
20.72
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Feeling 32 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1990 Feeling 32 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1990 Feeling 32 measures 9.85m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.95m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 66% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Feeling 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Feeling 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Feeling 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Feeling 32 · 1995 Feeling 39