1990 J/40 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1990 J/40
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 J/40Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHanse
Year1990–19952006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerRod Johnstonejudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft2.08 m (6.8 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 J/40
18.87
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 J/40
44.12
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 J/40
0.74
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 J/40
17.98
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 J/40 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 J/40 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1990 J/40 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1990 J/40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1990 J/40 is 2.00m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1990 J/40 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 J/40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.87 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1990 J/40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 J/40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 44.1% for the 1990 J/40 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 J/40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 J/40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 J/40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 J/40 · Hanse 342