1999 Catalina 400 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1999 Catalina 4001999 Catalina 400
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Catalina 400Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHanse
Year1999–20062006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGerry Douglasjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA12.12 m (39.8 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,845 kg (19,500 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.9 m² (720 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 1.82m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1999 Catalina 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Catalina 400 · Hanse 342