1990 Sabre 36 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison

1990 Sabre 36 1990 Sabre 36
VS
1972 Ericson 32 1972 Ericson 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 Sabre 36 1972 Ericson 32
General
Manufacturer Sabre Ericson
Year 1990–1998 1972–1978
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Roger Hewson Bruce King
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 52.5 m² (565 ft²) 39.0 m² (420 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
1972 Ericson 32
14.97
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
1972 Ericson 32
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
1972 Ericson 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Sabre 36
19.29
1972 Ericson 32
21.98

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Sabre 36 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1990 Sabre 36 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1990 Sabre 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 1.22m longer than the 1972 Ericson 32. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Sabre 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Sabre 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Sabre 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Sabre 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ericson 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Sabre 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS