1990 Sabre 36 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Sabre 362010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerSabreElan
Year1990–19982010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRoger HewsonRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.5 m² (565 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Sabre 36
19.29
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Sabre 36 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1990 Sabre 36 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1990 Sabre 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 0.61m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Sabre 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Sabre 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Sabre 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Sabre 36 · 2010 Elan 340