1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerWauquiezMoody
Year1990–19981984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUK
DesignerJean-Marie FinotBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity65 L (17.2 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s design by Wauquiez from France, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was penned by Jean-Marie Finot. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 65L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Moody 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 · 1984 Moody 33