Catalina 270 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

Catalina 270 Catalina 270
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 270 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
Manufacturer Catalina Pacific Seacraft
Year 1992–2002 1988–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 8.31 m (27.3 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 7.24 m (23.8 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 2.74 m (9.0 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.47 m (4.8 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 907 kg (2,000 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 31.0 m² (334 ft²) 40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 12 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 270
18.01
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 270
39.21
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 270
0.83
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 270
16.24
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 270 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 270 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The Catalina 270 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the Catalina 270 measures 8.31m (27.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is 1.14m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 116% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 270 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 270 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.83). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Catalina 270 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 270 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS