1992 J/32 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1992 J/32
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 J/321979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsWesterly
Year1992–19971979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerRod JohnstoneEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.91 m (32.5 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.4 m² (521 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 J/32
20.00
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 J/32
43.52
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 J/32
0.80
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 J/32
16.59
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 J/32 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1992 J/32 is 0.16m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 J/32 · 1979 Westerly Fulmar