1993 Hunter 376 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1993 Hunter 3761993 Hunter 376
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1993 Hunter 376Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerHunterHanse
Year1993–19972006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn Hendersonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA11.28 m (37.0 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area58.9 m² (634 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Hunter 376
15.96
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Hunter 376
37.51
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Hunter 376
0.77
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Hunter 376
18.59
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Hunter 376 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Hunter 376 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1993 Hunter 376 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1993 Hunter 376 measures 11.28m (37.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1993 Hunter 376 is 0.98m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1993 Hunter 376 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Hunter 376 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 58.9 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Hunter 376 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1993 Hunter 376 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Hunter 376 provides 8 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Hunter 376 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1993 Hunter 376 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1993 Hunter 376 · Hanse 342