Catalina 250 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison
Catalina 250
1984 Pearson 34
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 250 | 1984 Pearson 34 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Pearson |
| Year | 1994–2004 | 1984–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.78 m (22.2 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.59 m (8.5 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.60 m (5.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 612 kg (1,349 lbs) | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 24.5 m² (264 ft²) | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 20 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 42 L (11.1 gal) | 152 L (40.2 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 250 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 250 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The Catalina 250 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the Catalina 250 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 2.74m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1984 Pearson 34 displaces approximately 243% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 250 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 250 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the Catalina 250 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 250 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1984 Pearson 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 250 · 1984 Pearson 34